and I understand them. But I don’t accept them. Know why?
1980 is not the “70s”
1990 is not the “80s”
2000 is not the “90s”
and
2010 is not part of the “Aughts”
it’s just not.
That’s what I believe. You are welcome to your own opinion, just keep it away from me.
code-yellow liked this
navelgazing101 liked this
emblebee liked this
littlemisssailor liked this
zoee liked this
britticisms liked this
groverviolet liked this
lolita-esque reblogged this from lickystickypickywe and added:
This is just so wrong. So wrong. =))))
little-wife liked this
jermainia liked this
bingoparaphernalia liked this
istealpens liked this
12345pigeons liked this
pumarecelosa liked this
thislife-isyours liked this
turningback liked this
mendaciloquence liked this
teejayhanton liked this
awonderfulworld liked this
sanamivera liked this
hman liked this
librarianpirate liked this
wooliebear liked this
aureliansaura liked this
butterandguns liked this
irishmexi liked this
suckthislemon liked this
agr8perhaps liked this
quixotekid liked this
tylercoates liked this
nonesmadurr liked this
tanya77 reblogged this from themattsmith and added:
only 10 years long (i.e. 2000-2009),...11 years (2000-2010). Argument over.
missmlady liked this
datn reblogged this from lickystickypickywe and added:
All you have to do is compare the size of the party happening at 23:59 1999-12-31 to the size of the one at...
whatswithtodaytoday liked this
iambal liked this
lickystickypickywe reblogged this from themattsmith and added:
i tried “adoring” this but could
johnlempka liked this
kittykittybangbang liked this
warrennotg liked this
sade liked this
fatmanatee liked this
matt-t liked this
asweetbeginning liked this
damonator liked this
themattsmith posted this
